Experts warn FG as debt profile hits N41.6tr to Stop borrowing
As the federal government recommends additional
borrowing for the 2023 year budget, economists have been harsh with the
government. They unanimously urged the government to halt borrowing, just as
yesterday's confirmation by Mrs. Patience Oniha, Director-General of the Debt
Management Office (DMO), that Nigeria's debt load as of March 2022 was N41.60
trillion.
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited
was criticized by the Nigerian Customs Service (NCS) for claiming that billions
of naira were spent on petroleum subsidies annually.
In her appearance yesterday at the House of
Representatives Committee on Finance's ongoing engagement on the 2023–2025
Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and Fiscal Strategy Paper (FSP), Oniha
blamed Nigeria's high debt profile on a lack of revenues and the National
Assembly's approval of the annual budget with a deficit, which increased the
country's debt stock.
She expressed sadness that the nation has been operating
on a deficit budget with increased borrowing for many years, particularly since
the COVID-19 pandemic epidemic, and emphasized that the only solution is higher
revenue production.
Oniha blamed Nigeria's high debt profile on a lack of
revenues and the National Assembly's approval of the annual budget with a
deficit, which increased the country's debt stock, in her appearance yesterday
at the ongoing engagement on the 2023–2025 Medium Term Expenditure Framework
(MTEF) and Fiscal Strategy Paper (FSP) by the House of Representatives
Committee on Finance.
She lamented the fact that the country has been running
a deficit budget and borrowing more money for many years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic epidemic, and emphasized that the only way out is
to improve revenue generation.
"Borrowing would not halt until the concerns of
staff, overhead, and capital spending are appropriately addressed in the
budget."
Remember that the 2023-2025 MTEF/FSP was presented to lawmakers on Tuesday by Zainab Ahmed, Minister of Cover, Budget, and National Planning. In it, she revealed that the Federal Government will borrow nearly N11 trillion and sell national assets to finance the 2023 budget deficit.
The combined deficit for the year (fiscal and
project-related loans) was N7.35 trillion. In the best-case scenario, the
amount is anticipated to increase by 53.7% to N11.3 trillion the following
year. When subsidies are removed, the amount will reach N12.4 trillion.
Oniha continued, "A World Bank report showed that
Nigeria has a low debt to GDP ratio but a very high debt service to revenue
ratio. As a result, these other countries' tax-to-GDP ratios are greater than
Nigeria's.
"Nigeria ranked 195 out of around 197 countries in
the World Bank study report, which means we outperformed Yemen and Afghanistan.
We don't want to resemble those areas, in my opinion.
"Rather than looking at the deficit to fund our
activities, you must carefully examine the revenues. How much revenue is there
when we talk about an N11 trillion deficit and borrowing for 2023? One is that.
The extent of the borrowing was 62% of the budget when we look at the first
tranche, which was N10 trillion for the entire year of subsidies and N9
trillion for subsidies the following year. That's a lot. I believe that both
parties are responsible. Check the various expense lines to see what we are
capable of. Therefore, if the deficit is smaller, borrowing will also be
smaller, which is how to increase at a slower rate.
In addition, to the detriment of the general populace,
the Controller General (CG) of Customs, Hameed Ali, accused NNPC of producing
fraudulent data in the name of subsidy payments.
Ali, who also testified before the committee, disputed the NNPC's estimate of the nation's daily petroleum consumption, claiming that it should not be greater than 62 million based on the results of the service.
The CG claims that NNPC never accounts for the daily
consumption imbalance of 36 million liters, although it is nevertheless
subsidized.
"Not everyone is able to fill their tank up every
day. Over 500 tankers are needed to transport the 36 million liter shortfall.
He asked, "Where do they load it and carry it that we do not know?
The session was presided over by Saidu Abdullahi, the committee's deputy chairman, who said: "The country is in an excellent position to maintain borrowing. There will always be a need to borrow. No matter how much money we make, the nation must borrow. The sustainability of the debt we are taking on is what we should be concerned about, and based on what she has said, the nation is doing well in terms of managing its debt.
Dr. Ayo Teriba, CEO of Economics Associates, commented
on the debt crisis and said it would be very challenging to balance the budget
given the current economic situation.
We spent N4.7 trillion between January and April but
only brought in N1.6 trillion. More than N3 trillion was spent on the deficit.
Only N1.6 trillion would be spent if you wanted to keep spending under what was
brought in. Additionally, the interest payment, which was N1.94 trillion, would
not be covered. Therefore, creating a cash budget is not in the cards, Teriba
stated.
The economist believes that using debt financing is a
question of policy choice rather than necessity, even though he forbids cash
back zero budgeting, as it were. He bemoaned the fact that the administration
has disregarded calls for it to generate revenue from idle national assets
during the previous seven years.
The current administration's rigid stance on debt
funding has run into a brick block nine months before the conclusion of its
second term.
Teriba asserted that after more than seven years of
steadfastly sticking with a less sustainable funding alternative, it is
difficult to expect the administration to change course nine months before the
end of its term.
"I believe we would have to accept it as the
administration's legacy; it was an administration that essentially handed on a
100% deficit. The following regime would need to find the funds to pay off the
debts racked up by the previous one, he said..
In response to the question of whether shifting the
burden to the incoming administration will cause a catastrophe, the economist
emphasized that "Nigeria is not in any crisis but has options" that
the present administration is failing to consider. He claimed that the asset
lease option is a win-win strategy that Saudi Arabia, India, and Brazil have
used to provide predictable and sustainable cash flow and spur growth.
"In order to bring in money for the government,
bring in foreign investors to idle assets. We have underutilized
infrastructure, idle assets, and enterprises whose market value is unknown,
Teriba said.
While some economists have claimed that the government
has failed in its management of the economy, Bismarck Rewane, a member of the
recently largely disbanded Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC), told
The Guardian that the current administration has taken some actions whose
effects are only now beginning to become apparent.
"We need to boost revenue, that's what. The biggest
problem is the debt-to-revenue ratio. We can avoid any catastrophe if we boost
sales and growth.
"They are raising awareness of it. They're
attempting to be effective. To increase revenue is one thing, and to stop leaks
is quite another. If you stop leaks, your influence increases.
He acknowledged that the administration has taken some initiatives, but said
that there is a delay between when we take action and when we see the results.
However, Godwin Owoh, a professor of applied economics,
a consultant for the World Bank, and a specialist in debt management has the
opposite opinion. He warned that the administration is dangerously traveling
at top speed while the tires are flat by using the comparison of a car and a
flat tire. He insisted that it was time to evaluate the framework and implement
the shift away from the culture of borrowing.
This government should have taken the approach that is
typically taken when a state and market have failed. Driving a vehicle at 120
km/h while it has a flat tire is not possible. In addition to the market
failing, the state has also failed, he claimed.
Owoh recalls a day when 12 of the 18 experts moderating a session in Rwanda were from Nigeria. He claimed that an Indian participant in the session questioned what the Nigerian specialists were doing while the country's economy was being mismanaged and warned that exclusive policies would ultimately kill the economy.
The members of their system who wear the toga of professionals have long lost professionalism. If not, nobody would be discussing the budget deficit or outlining potential outcomes... Due to incorrect MTEF/FSP implementation, that deficit is unwarranted, he said.
The economist expressed disapproval of taking on debts
that will not improve the Federal Government's future cash flow and argued that
it would be irresponsible to consider borrowing money the following year to
finance a budget that would not include provisions for capital projects.
Meanwhile, the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), a civil rights advocacy group, criticized President Muhammadu Buhari's administration on Thursday for failing to plan for treasury-funded capital projects for 2023, despite the enormous debts that the All Progressives Congress (APC) incurred to pay for spending in the upcoming budget.
Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, the national coordinator of
HURIWA, stated in a statement that the government must not raise the cost of
governance at the expense of the social well-being and security of the people
since doing so must have a beneficial effect on people's lives.
It is puzzling that President Buhari's administration
has continued its borrowing binge since 2015, he noted. It is even more amazing
that the country can go a whole year without any major capital projects,
despite the fact that the government continues to run up recurrent costs and
raise the cost of running the country, which harms residents' social security
and wellness.
"The government's projected budget for 2023 is
unacceptable. We demand changes to reflect the will of the people, particularly
to strengthen the fight against insecurity, lower governance costs, boost
social welfare for the underprivileged, combat systemic corruption at its
height within government circles at all levels, and rebuild the badly damaged
strategic sectors of roads, schools, and other infrastructure.